Figma vs InVision: UI/UX Tool Showdown
Back to topFigma vs Invision: A Comparison
It's essential to use tools that enhance creativity, collaboration, and efficiency. Figma and InVision are two of the most popular design and prototyping tools used by professionals worldwide. In this article, we’ll compare these tools across several criteria to determine their strengths and weaknesses.

We broke down the key criteria to consider in the table below for your convenience:
| Criteria | Figma | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| User Interface and Experience | Intuitive, user-friendly | Efficient, browser-based |
| Design Capabilities | Extensive templates and plugins | Limited design features |
| Collaboration and Teamwork | Real-time collaboration | Effective for feedback collection |
| Integration with Other Tools | Wide range of integrations | Good integrations |
| Performance and Speed | Efficient handling of large files | Fast prototyping, issues with large projects |
| Prototype and Animation Features | Versatile prototyping features | Intuitive prototyping and feedback |
| Feedback and Testing | Effective for sharing and gathering feedback | Commenting feature for organized collaboration |
| Platform Availability and Accessibility | Cloud-based, accessible across devices | Cloud-based, browser-dependent |
| Pricing and Plans | Various plans, from free to paid | Several tiers, cost concerns for individuals |
| Community and Support | Extensive support, active community | Attentive customer service, multiple tools-in-one |
| Ease of Learning and Adaptability | Simple learning curve, adaptable | Efficient once mastered, browser-based limitations |
| Real-Time Collaboration Features | Facilitates real-time collaboration | Effective collaboration in prototyping and feedback |
| Mobile Compatibility and Responsiveness | High mobile compatibility | Supports mobile for prototype testing |
| File Management and Organization | Efficient file management system | Challenges with large project organization |

Related: Top 12 CMS Platforms for Design Flexibility
Back to top
Figma vs Invision: Best Practices
Figma Best Practices
- Leverage Components and Styles: Figma enables designers to create components and styles that are reusable across different files. This ensures consistency and efficiency in your design process.
- Utilize Auto Layout: Auto Layout in Figma helps in building responsive designs that adjust automatically as you change content, making it easier to design for various screen sizes.
- Use Prototyping Features: Figma’s prototyping features allow you to create interactive prototypes with ease, facilitating better user testing and feedback collection.
- Collaborate Effectively: Take advantage of Figma’s real-time collaboration features. Sharing files and getting instant feedback can greatly enhance the design process.
- Organize Your Work: Keep your files and layers organized. Naming conventions and consistent layer structures will make it easier to navigate complex designs.
InVision Best Practices
- Embrace a Design System: InVision promotes the use of design systems, which are collections of repeatable components and standards. These systems help in changing the pace of creation and innovation within teams.
- Plan Your Design System: While a style guide or pattern library can be a starting point for a design system, they are not the only components. Planning how to build and implement a design system in your organization is crucial for success.
- Understand the Role of a Design System: A design system isn’t just a collection of assets and components. It's more about the structure, meaning, and embodiment of a system of concepts, far beyond just reusable UI elements.
- Conduct a Visual Audit: Start building your design system with a visual audit of your current design. This helps in understanding the scope and scale of the undertaking.
- Create a Visual Design Language: Develop a visual design language, considering the role of color, typography, sizing, spacing, and imagery. This forms the core of your design system.
Back to top
Recommendation: Design Flexibility
When it comes to design flexibility, a key aspect for any UI/UX designer, the choice between Figma and InVision often depends on the specific needs of the project.
Figma is widely acclaimed for its design flexibility, thanks to its vast library of templates, UI kits, and an extensive range of plugins. These features enable designers to create high-quality designs efficiently, catering to a wide array of design categories, including mobile apps and websites.
InVision, while offering robust prototyping features, is more focused on the collaborative aspect of design and feedback collection. It's a powerful tool for prototype creation, but it tends to have limitations when it comes to extensive design capabilities compared to Figma.
Given these considerations, Figma generally stands out as the preferred tool for design flexibility. Its ability to support a wide range of design tasks, combined with its seamless integration capabilities, makes it a more versatile choice for designers looking to push creative boundaries.
Need help with your UI/UX? Contact us today for a complete UX review.
Back to top